Difference Between Active Optical Network and Passive Optical Network

05/23/2024
Posted by topfiberbox

04 Dec

FTTH enables the installation of fiber directly from the central point to the end user’s home, providing unprecedented high-speed Internet access. There are two types of technologies for implementing FTTH networks: AON (active optical network) and PON (passive optical network).

What is AON?

AON is an Active Optical Network, which mainly uses a point-to-point (PTP) network architecture, and each user can have a dedicated optical fiber line. Active optical network means that during the transmission of signals, switching equipment such as routers and switching aggregators, active optical devices, etc. are deployed from the central office to the user distribution unit. These switching equipment are driven by electricity to manage Signal distribution and direction signals for specific customers. Active optical devices include light sources (lasers), optical receivers, optical transceiver modules, optical amplifiers (fiber amplifiers and semiconductor optical amplifiers), etc.

What is PON?

PON is Passive Optical Network, a point-to-multipoint network structure, and is the main technology to realize FTTB / FTTH (fiber to the home. Passive optical network refers to ODN (optical distribution network) using only optical fibers and passive components and only needs to use active equipment at the signal source and signal receiving end.

In a typical PON system, the optical splitter is the core, and the optical splitter is used to separate and collect optical signals transmitted through the network. These splitters for PON are bidirectional. In the downstream direction, multiple services such as IP data, voice, and video are distributed by the OLT located in the central office through broadcast, and are distributed through the 1: N passive optical distributor in the ODN To all ONU units on the PON; in the upstream direction, various service information from each ONU is coupled to the same fiber through the 1: N passive optical combiner in the ODN without interference, and finally sent to the OLT at the central office for reception end.

A passive optical network includes an optical line terminal (OLT) installed at the central control office and a set of supporting optical network units (ONUs) installed at the user end. The optical distribution network (ODN) between the OLT and the ONU contains optical fibers and passive splitters or couplers. PON is divided into three technical standards: APON (ATM PON) based on ATM, EPON (Ethernet PON) based on Ethernet, and GPON (Gigabit PON) based on General Frame Protocol.

The difference

In the AON network, users have dedicated optical fiber lines, which are easy for network maintenance, capacity expansion, and network upgrades. And AON network covers a wide range, covering a range of about 100 kilometres; PON networks are usually limited to fiber optic cables up to 20 kilometres. AON mainly guides optical signals through active equipment, and PON uses passive devices without power supply, resulting in AON network deployment higher than PON cost.

Newer What is Fiber Optic Patch Cord?

Older Ideal Solution For FTTX Network- Fiber Termination Box

23 Mar

The Applications And Benefits of Splitter Distribution Box

The post titled “The Applications And Benefits of Splitter Distribution Box” delves into the essential role of splitter distribution boxes in modern electrical and communication systems. Highlighting their pivotal features, the article describes how these devices efficiently manage and distribute electrical power or signal inputs to multiple outputs, ensuring seamless operations in various settings. The key advantages include enhanced safety through minimized circuit overload risks, simplified installation and maintenance, and cost-effective scalability for expanding networks. Distinctive qualities such as robust construction, adaptability to different environments, and compatibility with a range of cables and connectors make splitter distribution boxes indispensable in industries like telecommunications, data centers, and residential setups. The post compellingly underscores how their adoption can lead to improved efficiency, reliability, and overall system performance.

29 Jan

How To Choose PLC Splitter For Your Fiber Network Application？

In the post titled “How To Choose PLC Splitter For Your Fiber Network Application,” the author delves into the crucial aspects of selecting the appropriate Planar Lightwave Circuit (PLC) splitters for optimizing fiber network performance. Key focal points include understanding splitter types, their various configurations, and the importance of insertion loss and uniformity. The post underscores the advantages of PLC splitters, such as their compact size, cost-efficiency, and reliability in handling multiple channels. Distinctive qualities highlighted include low failure rates and suitability for a range of network applications. By following the detailed guidance, readers can make informed choices ensuring robust and efficient fiber network infrastructure.

11 Jan

Basic Knowledge of OLT, ONU, ONT And ODN

The post titled “Basic Knowledge of OLT, ONU, ONT And ODN” delves into the essential components of fiber optic networks. It explains that Optical Line Terminal (OLT) is a crucial device located at the service provider’s central office, responsible for managing data traffic over the fiber network. Optical Network Unit (ONU) and Optical Network Terminal (ONT) are devices at the customer’s premises that convert optical signals back to electrical signals. The Optical Distribution Network (ODN) encompasses the optical fibers and splitters that connect the OLT to multiple ONUs/ONTs.

Pivotal features highlighted include the high-speed data transmission capabilities and the efficiency of fiber optic networks in handling large bandwidths effortlessly. Advantages emphasize enhanced internet speeds, long-distance data transmission without significant loss, and reliable connectivity. Distinctive qualities focus on the minimal interference and high security inherent to fiber optics, making it an optimal choice for modern telecommunication needs.

In summary, the post underscores the integral roles of OLT, ONU, ONT, and ODN within fiber optic systems, showcasing their collective contribution to robust, high-speed, and reliable internet connectivity.

25 Nov

The Important Technical Indicators Of Fiber Optical Splitter

In the post “The Important Technical Indicators Of Fiber Optical Splitter,” the author delves into the essential metrics that define the efficacy and quality of fiber optical splitters. The article emphasizes key technical indicators such as insertion loss, return loss, split ratio, and wavelength range. These parameters are pivotal for ensuring high performance and reliable data transmission in fiber optic networks. The post highlights the critical advantages of fiber optical splitters, including their ability to facilitate multiple connections, cost efficiency, and low signal attenuation. Furthermore, it showcases the unique qualities of these devices, such as their compact form factor and robustness, making them indispensable in modern telecommunication infrastructures.

11 Oct

Why Fiber Optic Splitter Loss Table Is So Important?

It highlights key features such as precise loss management, enhanced network efficiency, and reliable performance monitoring. The article emphasizes the advantages of using these tables, including optimized bandwidth distribution, minimized signal degradation, and cost-effective maintenance. Distinctive qualities include their ability to provide accurate diagnostic data, support efficient network design, and ensure superior service quality. By focusing on these pivotal elements, the post makes a compelling case for the indispensable nature of fiber optic splitter loss tables in ensuring robust and high-performing fiber optic infrastructures.

06 Sep

Fiber Optic Splitter Types

The post highlights key splitter types, including fused biconic tapered splitters (FBT), planar lightwave circuit splitters (PLC), and advanced splitter configurations like cascaded and star couplers. It underscores the pivotal features of each type, such as FBT’s cost-effectiveness for small-scale applications and PLC’s superior performance in handling high-density networks. Advantages discussed include improved signal transmission, greater reliability, and scalability. Distinctive qualities such as environmental resilience, compact design, and high split ratios are also explored, making this post a valuable resource for choosing the right splitter for specific network requirements.

Knowledge